Compare Jaguar XF X250 facelift vs Jaguar XF X260 vs Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Jaguar XF X250 facelift

Jaguar XF X260

Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Jaguar XF X250 faceliftJaguar XF X260Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift
Variants
2.0 i4 Ti
2.2 TDi4 163
2.2 TDi4 190
2. TDi4 200
3.0 V6
3.0 V6 Supercharged
3.0 V6 Supercharged AWD
3.0 TDV6 240
XF S 3.0 TDV6 275
5.0 V8
XFR
XFR-S
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6

Reviews

Neofiliac score83%71%43%
Pros
  • Superb double-wishbone suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Wonderful supercharged engine lineup
  • Good supercharged V6
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Improved exterior design
  • Improved engine lineup
Cons
  • Some engines do not deserve the Jaguar name
  • Styling still a bit off
  • Poor reliability
  • Bland styling
  • Less well appointed than many competitors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.