Compare Infiniti M-Series III / Nissan Fuga (Y50) vs Infiniti Q50 facelift vs Infiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)

Infiniti M-Series III / Nissan Fuga (Y50)

Infiniti Q50 facelift

Infiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)

Infiniti M-Series III / Nissan Fuga (Y50)Infiniti Q50 faceliftInfiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)
Variants
M35 5AT
M35 7AT
M35x 5AT
M35x 7AT
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score76%79%68%
Pros
  • Elegantly designed
  • Reliable and responsive NA engines
  • New double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Great suspension setup
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Above average styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather good styling (rare for Infiniti of the era)
  • Powerful VK45DE 4.5L V8
Cons
  • Little improvement over pre-facelift
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Confusing model names

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.