Compare Nissan Maxima A34 vs Nissan Bluebird Sylphy G10 vs Nissan Sentra B15

Variants
3.5
3.5 AT
1.5 105hp
1.5 105hp AT
1.5 109hp
1.5 109hp AT
1.6 110hp
1.6 110hp AT
1.6 118hp
1.6 118hp AT
1.8 115hp AWD AT
1.8 117hp AWD AT
1.8 120hp AT
2.0 145hp CVT
2.0 150hp CVT
1.8
2.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
329 L / 11.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
452 kg / 996 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Spring Strut
Helical spring
Tire Size
225/55 R17

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Weight
1610.0 kg / 3549.4 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2535 mm / 99.8 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
268.0 hp / 199.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.6 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
345 Nm / 254.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2008
2000 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
26%
14%
Pros
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Rather spacious inside
  • Small turning circle
  • Very lightweight
  • Good reliability record
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad suspension options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.