Compare Mazda 3 / Axela (BK) vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler Concorde II

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Chrysler 200 II

Chrysler Concorde II

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)Chrysler 200 IIChrysler Concorde II
Variants
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%29%7%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Simple rear suspension
  • Unique design language
  • Unreliable powertrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.