Compare Mazda 3 / Axela (BK) vs Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S80

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S80

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)Volvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S80
Variants
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.0T 163hp
2.0T 163hp AT
2.0T 180hp
2.0T 180hp AT
2.0T 226hp
2.0T 226hp AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4D 130hp
2.4D 163hp
2.4D 163hp AT
2.4T 200hp
2.5D 140hp
2.8T 272hp
2.9 196hp
2.9 200hp
2.9 204hp
2.9 204hp AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%36%21%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Compact I6 engine for FWD
  • Sweet I5 engine options
  • Classy exterior design
  • Great safety record
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Nothing exciting

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.