Compare Volvo S60 vs Volvo S60 Cross Country vs Renault Talisman
Variants
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.3 T5
2.3 T5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4 D5 163hp
2.4 D5 185hp
2.4 T5 260hp
2.4 T5 260hp AT
2.4D
2.4D AT
2.4T 200hp
2.4T 200hp AT
2.4T 200hp AWD
2.5T 210hp
2.5T 210hp AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
TCe 160 4CONTROL
TCe 160 EDC FAP
Energy dCi 110 ECO2
Energy dCi 130
Energy dCi 130 EDC
Energy dCi 160 EDC6
Energy TCe 150 EDC7
Energy TCe 200 EDC7
Blue dCi 150
Blue dCi 150 4CONTROL
Energy TCe 225 4CONTROL EDC FAP
Energy TCe 225 EDC FAP
Blue dCi 200 EDC 4CONTROL EDC
Blue dCi 160 EDC
Blue dCi 200 4CONTROL EDC
Blue dCi 200 EDC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
424 L / 15.0 cu-ft ~ 1034 L / 36.5 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft
608 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1022 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
474 kg / 1045 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
201 mm / 7.9 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1428 mm / 56.2 in
1539 mm / 60.6 in
1463 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4849 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1804 mm / 71.0 in
Track Width | Front
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
Weight
1656.0 kg / 3650.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.27
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
40%
7%
Pros
- Interesting set of I5 engines
- Good reliability
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Fuel consumption figures can be rather low
Cons
- Uninspiring drive
- Sterile design inside and outside
- Rather questionable exterior design
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.