Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2 vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Volvo S40 II facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Volvo S40 II faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 163hp
2.2D 185hp
2.5
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%53%34%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good engine reliability
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Elegant exterior design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine option
  • Old transmission options
  • Sterile interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.