Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Chrysler Sebring (JR) vs Chrysler 200 (JS)

Volvo S40 II facelift

Chrysler Sebring (JR)

Chrysler 200 (JS)

Volvo S40 II faceliftChrysler Sebring (JR)Chrysler 200 (JS)
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%12%15%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
  • No longer strange looking
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Unreliable powertrain
  • Outdated engine and transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.