Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S40 II vs Volvo S60

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S40 II

Volvo S60

Volvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S40 IIVolvo S60
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T AWD
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.3 T5
2.3 T5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4 D5 163hp
2.4 D5 185hp
2.4 T5 260hp
2.4 T5 260hp AT
2.4D
2.4D AT
2.4T 200hp
2.4T 200hp AT
2.4T 200hp AWD
2.5T 210hp
2.5T 210hp AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%33%33%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Interesting Inline-5 engines, including the T5
  • Interesting set of I5 engines
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable exterior design
  • Simple interiors
  • Uninspiring drive
  • Sterile design inside and outside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.