Compare Cadillac XTS
Cadillac XTS | |
---|---|
Variants | 3.6L V6 3.6L V6 AWD 3.6T V6 |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 26% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"509 L / 18.0 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"7.1 L / 7.5 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"5.7 L / 6.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"70.0 L / 18.5 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Independent, spring"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Independent, spring, Pneumatic"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"245/45 R19, 245/40 R20"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.8 m / 38.7 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"4-door Sedan"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1510 mm / 59.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"5131 mm / 202.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1852 mm / 72.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1582.0 mm / 62.3 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1587.0 mm / 62.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1877.0 kg / 4138.1 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"19 in, 20 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2837 mm / 111.7 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"11.2 L/100km / 21.0 MPG (combined) | 13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Towing Capacity","Fv":"454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"LFX"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"94.0 mm / 3.7 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"11.5:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"305.0 hp / 227.4 kW @ 6800 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"85.6 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"85.6 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic Hydra-Matic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2012 ~ 2018"}]]
Related Products
Ford Taurus 6 2009
- Increased power output
- Better interior appointments
- More imposing exterior design
· 21%
Alpina B7 F01/F02 2009
- Good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Arguably even better-looking than the F01
- Great fit and finish
· 84%
Lexus LS 5 (XF50) 2017
- Comfortable yet good-handling multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Imposing styling
· 68%
- Superb suspension setup all-around
- Amazing 4.2 TDI and W12 engines
- Class-leading interior appointment
· 75%
Audi A8 D3 (4E) 2002
- Glorious 4.2 TDI and W12 engine options
- Much improved ZF 6HP transmission
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
· 77%
Rolls-Royce Ghost 2009
- Superb ride quality
- Exceptional fit and finish
- Down to 4.9s 0-100kph time
· 74%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.