Compare Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM vs Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR

Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR  Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM  Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM

Reviews

Neofiliac score43%71%52%
Pros
  • Optically stabilized
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Great image quality
  • Optically stabilized
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Zoom lock available
  • Optically stabilized
  • Very useful focal range
  • Affordable for what it offers
  • Good sharpness
Cons
  • Very dark maximum aperture
  • Large and heavy like a full-frame lens
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Mediocre build and optical performance
  • Dark maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Lens hood not included

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.