Compare Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz GLB X247

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLB X247

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 faceliftMercedes-Benz GLB X247
Variants
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
AMG GLB 35 4MATIC
GLB 180d
GLB 200
GLB 200d
GLB 200d 4MATIC
GLB 220d
GLB 220d 4MATIC
GLB 250
GLB 250 4MATIC

Reviews

Neofiliac score28%36%36%
Pros
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Reliable engine lineup
  • Decent styling
  • Marginal offroad capabilities
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Falsely sold as SUV
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.