Compare Ford GT 2
Ford GT 2 | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 63% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"57.0 L / 15.1 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"2"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Payload","Fv":"65 kg / 143 lbs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Offroad | Approach Angle","Fv":"9.5 deg"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Hydraulic Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Pushrod, double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Pushrod, double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"245/35 R20, 325/30 R20"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"12.2 m / 40.0 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Coupe"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Ground Clearance","Fv":"119 mm / 4.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1110 mm / 43.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4763 mm / 187.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"2004 mm / 78.9 in | 2238 mm / 88.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 2113 mm / 83.2 in (mirror folded)"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1694.0 mm / 66.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1661.0 mm / 65.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1385.0 kg / 3053.4 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"20 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2710 mm / 106.7 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"3 s"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.35"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"16.8 L/100km / 14.0 MPG (combined) | 21.4 L/100km / 11.0 MPG (urban) | 13.1 L/100km / 18.0 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"347.0 km/h / 215.6 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"92.5 mm / 3.6 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"9.0:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.5 L / 213.4 cu-in / 3497.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"656.0 hp / 489.2 kW @ 6250 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"187.6 hp/L / 3.1 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"86.7 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"746 Nm / 550.2 lb-ft @ 5900 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Bi-turbocharged multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"7-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2017"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Debut","Fv":"2015 North American International Auto Show"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Made In","Fv":"Canada"}]]
Related Products
McLaren 720S 2017
- Great performance
- Up to awe-inspiring 765PS of power and 800Nm of torque
- Glorious 8500rpm redline
· 90%
Bugatti Chiron 2016
- Class-leading performance
- Up to awe-inspiring 1600hp of power and tremendous 1600Nm of torque
- Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
· 98%
Koenigsegg Gemera 2020
- Down to exceptional 1.9s 0-100kph time
- Up to 1700hp of combined power
- Up to glorious 8500rpm redline
· 88%
Bugatti Divo 2018
- Class-leading performance
- Up to awe-inspiring 1500hp of power and tremendous 1600Nm of torque
- Superb styling
· 92%
McLaren 650S 2014
- Quick and fast
- Glorious 8500rpm redline in a bi-turbo engine
- Simplified styling compared to the 12C
· 85%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.