Site Title

Compare Hasselblad XCD 65mm F2.8 vs Hasselblad XCD 2.5/90V

Reviews

Neo score
72%
87%
Pros
  • Rather compact and lightweight
  • Beautifully constructed
  • The normal / standard lens
  • Exceptionally compact and lightweight
  • Superb image quality
  • Clutched focus ring
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
Cons
  • Expensive

Price

MSRP
2748 EUR
Offers (incl. referral links)

Construction

Colors
Black
Form Factor
Normal Prime Lens
Short Telephoto Prime Lens
Image Size
Medium Format (44x33)
Medium Format (44x33)
Lens Barrel
Physical aperture ring, Distance scale, DoF scale
Lens Mount
Hasselblad X-mount
Hasselblad X-mount
Motor
Stepper motor
Optical Formula | Elements
10 elements
9 elements
Optical Formula | Groups
6 groups
8 groups
Optical Formula | Special Glass
One aspherical element, one extra-low dispersion (ED) element. groups

Dimensions

Filter Diameter
67 mm / 2.64 in
72 mm / 2.83 in
Size | Diameter
81 mm / 3.19 in
75 mm / 2.95 in
Size | Length
93 mm / 3.66 in
95 mm / 3.74 in
Weight
727 g / 25.69 oz
551 g / 19.47 oz

Function

Angle Of View
45.7° Diagonal | 38.6° Horizontal | 26.3° Vertical
33.9° Diagonal | 28.4° Horizontal | 19.2° Vertical
Aperture
f/2.8 ~ f/32
f/2.5–32 ~ f/2.5–32
Autofocus
Yes
Yes
Crop Factor
0.8
0.8
Focal Length
65 mm
90 mm
Focal Length (35mm Equivalent)
51.4 mm
71.1 mm
Focus Type
Internal
Internal
Image Stabilization
No

Performance

Max Magnification
0.19x
Min Focus Distance
500 mm / 19.69 in
670 mm / 26.38 in

Production

Accessory
Lens hood included
Debut
2018-09-25
2022-09-07
Remove
Remove
Add up to 6 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.