Site Title

Compare Zeiss Distagon T* 1.4/35 ZM vs Zeiss Biogon T* 2/35 ZM

Reviews

Neo score
86%
86%
Pros
  • Bright maximum aperture
  • Excellent build quality
  • High micro contrast
  • Light in the hand
  • Low distortion
Cons
  • Low maximum magnification
  • Low maximum magnification

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Construction

Aperture Blades
10 blades
Colors
Silver or black
Form Factor
Wide-Angle Prime Lens
Wide-Angle Prime Lens
Image Size
Full-Frame
Full-Frame
Lens Barrel
Physical aperture ring, Distance scale, DoF scale
Physical aperture ring, Distance scale, DoF scale
Lens Mount
Leica M-mount
Leica M-mount
Material
metal barrel, metal mount
metal barrel, metal mount
Optical Formula | Elements
10 elements
9 elements
Optical Formula | Groups
7 groups
6 groups

Dimensions

Filter Diameter
49 mm / 1.93 in
43 mm / 1.69 in
Size | Diameter
63 mm / 2.48 in
52 mm / 2.05 in
Size | Length
65 mm / 2.56 in
68 mm / 2.68 in
Weight
381 g / 13.46 oz
240 g / 8.48 oz

Function

Angle Of View
63.5° Diagonal | 54.4° Horizontal | 37.8° Vertical
63.5° Diagonal | 54.4° Horizontal | 37.8° Vertical
Aperture
f/1.4 ~ f/16
f/2 ~ f/22
Autofocus
No
No
Focal Length
35 mm
35 mm
Image Stabilization
No
No

Performance

Max Magnification
0.06
0.056
Min Focus Distance
700 mm / 27.56 in
700 mm / 27.56 in

Production

Debut
2014-09-16
Remove
Remove
Add up to 6 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.